中国非遗社区保护的实践转向及关键问题

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (533 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract “Community- centered” is a basic concept that UNESCO has always adhered to in the process of safeguarding the intangible cultural heritage. The safeguarding practice has experienced a shift from “intangible cultural heritage into community” to “intangible cultural heritage in the community”. The latter aims to maintain public awareness and participation, so that the intangible cultural heritage that originally belonged to the public can return to the people and the community. Therefore, the public can gain respect and recognition in the process. However, owing to the distinction in both understanding and orientation of the community, the existent proposed mode of “intangible cultural heritage in the community” in China still has obvious traces of “intangible cultural heritage into community”. The endogenous community-oriented mechanism has not been generally formed, and the phenomenon of relying too much on the government and the government arranging still exists. In the future, we should negotiate between the public, inheritors and government staffs and integrate their different understandings of the concept of “community”. In other words, we should not only focus on the main inheritors, but also pay holistic attention to the members of the community, to create a benign atmosphere for the inheritance of intangible cultural heritage. In addition, it is also necessary to balance the relationship between government intervention and civil participation, promote the cooperation between the government and the public in terms of “cultural dialogue”, enhance public enthusiasm to participate, and promote the transformation of the community from being the participant to the leader.

Key words： community safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage community participation intangible cultural heritage into the community intangible cultural heritage in the community communalism

Received: 15 October 2023

PACS:

G124

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	CHENG Peng

Cite this article:

CHENG Peng. Practice Turning and Key Issues of Community Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage in China[J]. , 2024, 41(2): 56-65.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2024/V41/I2/56

[1] 杨利慧.以社区为中心——联合国教科文组织非遗保护政策中社区的地位及其界定[J].西北民族研究,2016,(4).
[2] 朝戈金. 联合国教科文组织《保护非物质文化遗产伦理原则》:绎读与评骘[J].内蒙古社会科学(汉文版),2016,37(5).
[3] 周超.社区参与:非物质文化遗产国际法保护的基本理念[J].河南社会科学,2011,19(2):33-37.
[4] 巴莫曲布嫫.从语词层面理解非物质文化遗产——基于《公约》“两个中文本”的分析[J].民族艺术,2015,(6):63-71.
[5] 安德明. 非物质文化遗产保护中的社区:含义、多样性及其与政府力量的关系[A].康丽.非物质文化遗产学术精粹(理论卷)[C].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2022.
[6] 唐璐璐. 《保护非物质文化遗产公约》释义[J].中国非物质文化遗产,2021,(6):109-113.
[7] 朱刚. 从“社会”到“社区”:走向开放的非物质文化遗产主体界定[J].民族艺术,2017,(5):42-49.
[8] 文化部对外文化联络局.联合国教科文组织《保护非物质文化遗产公约》基础文件汇编[M].北京:外文出版社,2012.
[9] 安德明. 以社区参与为基础构建人类命运共同体——社区在非物质文化遗产保护中的重要地位[R].杭州:第二届中国—中东欧国家非物质文化遗产保护专家级论坛,2018.140-149.
[10] 联合国教科文组织.保护非物质文化遗产伦理原则[J].巴莫曲布嫫,张玲译.民族文学研究,2016,(3):5-6.
[11] 吕微.社区优先还是社会优先?——民俗学的逻辑出发点与“《保护非物质文化遗产公约》修正案”[J].民俗研究,2021,(3):78-87+158-159.
[12] 张多.社区参与、社区缺位还是社区主义?——哈尼族非物质文化遗产保护的主体困境[J].西北民族研究,2018,(2).
[13] 杨利慧.官民协作:中国非遗保护的本土实践之路——以河北涉县女娲信仰的400年保护历程为个案[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,49(6):64-73.
[14] 唐璐璐. 机遇、困局与出路:2003年《公约》框架下的非遗传承[J].文化遗产,2020,(5):9-16.
[15] 郑杭生. 社会学概论新修(第4版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013.232-233.
[16] 文化和旅游部关于印发《“十四五”非物质文化遗产保护规划》的通知[EB/OL].中国政府网.http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-06/09/content_5616511.htm,2023-05-25.
[17] 中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅印发《关于进一步加强非物质文化遗产保护工作的意见》[EB/OL].中国政府网.http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2021-08/12/content_5630974.htm,2023-03-06.
[18] 王霄冰. 民俗文化的遗产化、本真性和传承主体问题——以浙江衢州“九华立春祭”为中心的考察[J].民俗研究,2012,(6):112-122.
[19] 上海市文化和旅游局.关于公布2019-2021年度上海市“非遗在社区”示范项目和示范点的通知[EB/OL].http://whlyj.sh.gov.cn/zw-hwlf2020/20200903/2a0d455029fd495b8c37c271ce9cb667.html,2023-05-28.