新质生产力：复合概念、发展基础与系统创新路径

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (583 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract As a composite concept encompassing political, academic, and industrial concepts, new productivity boosters are a core indicator of national competitiveness amidst the accelerated evolution of global political ideology and major changes. It serves as the fundamental driving force for upgrading production factors and transforming production relations through technological innovation. It constitutes the logical starting point and foothold for nurturing and forming strategic emerging industries and future industries. Innovation plays a leading role in developing new productivity boosters. China possesses advantages in innovation carriers, innovation factors, and innovation markets: diverse innovation entities, a comprehensive industrial system, a sound talent pool, a developed digital economy, relatively complete digital infrastructure, immense market scale, and outstanding innovation traction. Following the dynamic evolution logic of “incubation-generation-development-diffusion-sustainability,” there is a need to strengthen the dual balance of disruptive and incremental technological innovation; optimize organizational management models to cultivate new quality production relations; clarify the laws of industrial development to promote industrial integration and upgrading; construct a “industry-region-digital intelligence” integrated innovation ecosystem, optimize the path of institutional innovation, and advance multiple national strategic innovation linkages, ranging from technological innovation, organizational innovation, industrial innovation, ecological innovation to institutional innovation. This constitutes a systematic innovation path for new productivity boosters.

Key words： new productivity boosters new quality production relations high-quality development composite concept technological innovation systematic innovation path

Received: 20 February 2024

PACS:	F014.1
	C94

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	ZENG Xian-ju
	ZENG Kai

Cite this article:

ZENG Xian-ju,ZENG Kai. Composite Concept, Development Foundation and Systematic Innovation Path of New Productivity Boosters[J]. , 2024, 41(2): 5-15.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2024/V41/I2/5

[1] 谢伏瞻. 论新工业革命加速拓展与全球治理变革方向[J].经济研究,2019,54(7):4-13.
[2] 黄群慧. 新发展格局的理论逻辑、战略内涵与政策体系 ——基于经济现代化的视角[J].经济研究,2021,56(4):4-23.
[3] 黄奇帆. 战略与路径——黄奇帆的十二堂经济课[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2022.
[4] 中国社会科学院工业经济研究所课题组,史丹,覃毅等.中国经济发展的机遇与挑战——学习中央经济工作会议精神座谈会综述[J].中国工业经济,2024,(1):5-16.
[5] 习近平在黑龙江考察时强调牢牢把握在国家发展大局中的战略定位奋力开创黑龙江高质量发展新局面[N].人民日报,2023-09-09(001).
[6] 习近平在中共中央政治局第十一次集体学习时强调加快发展新质生产力扎实推进高质量发展[N].人民日报,2024-02-02(001).
[7] 洪银兴. 发展新质生产力建设现代化产业体系[J].当代经济研究,2024,(2):7-9.
[8] 刘志彪,凌永辉,孙瑞东.新质生产力下产业发展方向与战略——以江苏为例[J].南京社会科学,2023,(11):59-66.
[9] 蒋冠宏. 中国产业政策的均衡效应分析——基于政府补贴的视角[J].中国工业经济,2022,(6):98-116.
[10] 柳学信,曹成梓,孔晓旭.大国竞争背景下新质生产力形成的理论逻辑与实现路径[J/OL].重庆大学学报(社会科学版).http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/50.1023.C.20231228.0027.002.html,2023-12-29.
[11] 朱锋. 全球地缘政治格局与态势[J].人民论坛,2023,(24):12-16.
[12] 李应博,林子秋.技术权力与大国创新:西方国家认知逻辑、行为模式与外溢后果[J].政治学研究,2023,(5):126-142+210.
[13] 马克思恩格斯文集:第5卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009. 698.
[14] 薛永应,王师勤,李晓帆等.生产力的发展和社会主义社会的演进[J].哲学研究,1988,(2):3-10.
[15] 陈冰,解书森.关于科技革命对生产力发展的效应[J].哲学研究,1985,(2):9-15.
[16] 蒲清平,黄媛媛.习近平总书记关于新质生产力重要论述的生成逻辑、理论创新与时代价值[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2023,49(6):1-11.
[17] 石建勋,徐玲.加快形成新质生产力的重大战略意义及实现路径研究[J].财经问题研究,2024,(1):3-12.
[18] 周文,许凌云.论新质生产力:内涵特征与重要着力点[J].改革,2023,(10).
[19] 谢中起,索建华,张莹.数字生产力的内涵、价值与挑战[J].自然辩证法研究,2023,39(6):93-99.
[20] (德)马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第31卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1998.413.
[21] 高帆. “新质生产力”的提出逻辑、多维内涵及时代意义[J].政治经济学评论,2023,14(6):127-145.
[22] 周绍东,胡华杰.新质生产力推动创新发展的政治经济学研究[J/OL].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版).https://doi.org/10.14100/j.cnki.65-1039/g4.20231012.001,2023-11-12.
[23] 马克思恩格斯文集:第7卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2009. 832.
[24] Juhász R, Lane R, Rodrik D.The New Economics of Ind-ustrial Policy[Z].NBER Working Paper Series,2003.31538.
[25] Criscuolo C, Martin R, Overman H G, et al.Some Causal Effects of An Industrial Policy[J].American Eco-nomic Review, 2019, 109(1):48-85.
[26] 杨丹辉. 世界大变局下的产业政策:演进动向与逻辑重构[J].改革,2023,(11):2-14.
[27] 王贤彬,陈春秀.重点产业政策与制造业就业[J].经济研究,2023,58(10):34-54.
[28] 曾宪聚,曾凯,任慧等.专精特新企业成长研究:综述与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2024,46(1):62-76.
[29] 江小涓,孟丽君,魏必.以高水平分工和制度型开放提升跨境资源配置效率[J].经济研究,2023,58(8):15-31.
[30] 张辉,唐琦.新质生产力形成的条件、方向及着力点[J].学习与探索,2024,(1):82-91.
[31] 何玉长,刘泉林.数字经济的技术基础、价值本质与价值构成[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2021,38(3):57-66.
[32] (英)亚当·斯密.国民财富的性质和原因的研究[M].郭大力,王亚南译.北京:商务印书馆,2008.5.
[33] Abernathy W J, Utterback J M.Patterns of Industrial Innovation[J].Technology Review,1978,80(7):40-47.
[34] Funk R J, Owen-Smith J.A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change[J].Management Science,2017,63(3):791-817.
[35] March J G.Exploration and Exploitation in Organiza-tional Learning[J].Organization Science,1991,2(1):71-87.
[36] 张瑞敏. 永恒的活火[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2023.31.
[37] 黄群慧,盛方富.新质生产力系统:要素特质、结构承载与功能取向[J].改革,2024,(2):15-24.
[38] 芮明杰. 构建现代产业体系的战略思路、目标与路径[J].中国工业经济,2018,(9):24-40.
[39] Mariani M M, Machado I, Magrelli V, et al.Artificial Intelligence in Innovation Research:A Systematic Review, Conceptual Framework,Future Research Directions[EB/OL].https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation,2024-01-26.
[40] Adner R.Ecosystem as Structure:An Actionable Cons-truct for Strategy[J].Journal of Management,2017,43(1):39-58.
[41] 洪银兴,任保平.数字经济与实体经济深度融合的内涵和途径[J].中国工业经济,2023,(2):5-16.
[42] 郭克莎. 供给侧结构性改革[J].经济研究,2022,57(5):4-12.
[43] 江小涓,孟丽君.内循环为主、外循环赋能与更高水平双循环——国际经验与中国实践[J].管理世界,2021,37(1):1-19.