|
|
|
| Criminal Risks and Criminal Law Response in the Process of Information Integration through Shared Documents |
| HUANG Chen-chen |
| Law School, Minzu University of China, Beijing, 100081 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Compared to traditional local documents, shared documents with real-time collaboration as the main feature are more conducive to improving information integration efficiency and ensuring real-time updates of information content. However, they also provide a breeding ground for crimes that infringe on citizens’ personal information, leading to upgraded criminal methods, new crime scenes, a larger amount of involved information, and a wider range of information circulation. This type of criminal risk poses a serious threat to citizens’ personal information rights and their associated personal and property rights, and urgently requires criminal law to address it. The process of using shared documents for information integration involves multiple subjects such as document creators, retweeters, fillers, modifiers, replica creators, and holders. Each subject assumes different roles and has differences in specific behavior. Based on typological thinking, typical behavior types of different subjects should be considered separately to determine whether they meet the behavioral requirements of the crime of infringing on citizens’ personal information, and to determine the specific path of criminal law regulation. The amount of information involved in the case is crucial for determining whether the perpetrator is guilty or not, as well as for determining the severity of the punishment. When determining the quantity, attention should not only be paid to general identification rules but also to the handling of special situations caused by the collaborative editing and real-time updating of content by multiple people in shared documents.
|
|
Received: 31 August 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 汤建华. 健康医疗大数据共享风险及法治因应[J].学习与实践,2023,(8):54-60.
[2] 蒋敏娟. 跨域政府数据共享:实践探索与未来展望——以长三角地区为例[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2023,(14):102-111.
[3] 刘宪权. 人工智能时代的刑事风险与刑法应对[J].法商研究,2018,(1):3-11.
[4] 马改然. 新信息技术对刑法个人信息保护的挑战与破解路径[J].中国政法大学学报,2023,(3):245-261.
[5] 刘仁文. 论非法使用公民个人信息行为的入罪[J].法学论坛,2019,(6):118-126.
[6] 张昊.依法从严惩治侵犯公民个人信息犯罪[N].法治日报,2022-12-08(003).
[7] 银昕. “华住开房记录泄露案”该如何处罚[J].中国经济周刊,2018,(45):42-43.
[8] 储陈城. 刑法应对网络暴力的流变及其基本立场[J].中国刑事法杂志,2023,(4):35-52.
[9] 周光权. 侵犯公民个人信息罪的行为对象[J]清华法学,2021,(3):25-40.
[10] 刘双阳. “合理处理”与侵犯公民个人信息罪的出罪机制[J].华东政法大学学报,2021,(6):57-72.
[11] 黄陈辰. 论公开信息的刑法保护[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2022,(3):84-91.
[12] 高铭暄,马克昌.刑法学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2022.193.
[13] 彭训文.助力防疫,平台有新招[N].人民日报海外版,2022-04-22(008).
[14] 姜涛,郭欣怡.已公开个人信息刑法规制的边界[J].学术界,2023,(3):95-111.
[15] 刘宪权,宋子莹.非法使用个人信息行为刑法规制论[J].青少年犯罪问题,2022,(4):64-73.
[16] 张东生,戴有举.侵犯公民个人信息罪问题研究[J].河南财经政法大学学报,2018,(3):64-71.
[17] 张明楷. 刑法学[M].北京:法律出版社,2021.481.
[18] 李静然,王肃之.侵犯公民个人信息罪的情节要素与数量标准研究[J].法律适用,2019,(9):69-76.
[19] 简洁.公民个人信息类型和数量如何认定[N].检察日报,2021-10-12(007).
[20] 黄陈辰. 侵犯公民个人信息罪行为要件的教义学重释——从“主体间移转”到“利用能力新增”[J].北方法学,2023,(5):106-115.
[21] 喻海松. 侵犯公民个人信息罪司法疑难之案解[J].人民司法,2018,(32):13-16.
[22] 蔡云. 公民个人信息的司法内涵[J].人民司法,2020,(2):24-26. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 40 
