乡村经济韧性的时空分布及组态影响因素

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (636 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Improving the resilience of rural economy is a prerequisite for the comprehensive revitalization of rural areas. Taking elasticity, adaptability and transformability as the benchmark dimensions, the evaluating indicator system of rural economic resilience is constructed and the spatial-temporal distribution characteristics of rural economic resilience in different years at provincial level are analyzed. The study finds that there is regional convergence of rural economic resilience in 2012-2020, but the differences between rural economic resilience at provincial level are gradually weakened. Rural economic resilience has significant spatial correlation in geographical space, with local “high-high agglomeration” and “high-low agglomeration” as the main manifestations. Based on the TOE (technology-organization-environment) theoretical framework, six core factors affecting the resilience of rural economy, including digital production, hardware facilities, human resources, financial capital, market size and professional services, are identified. After comparing the impact effects of each factor, it is found that professional services has the greatest impact on the resilience of rural economy. Hardware facilities, digital production, human resources and financial capital are second, and market size has the least impact. Furthermore, the fuzzy sets qualitative comparative analysis method is used to explore the linkage matching effect of each influencing factor. The analysis result indicates that rural economic resilience is the result of complex coordination of multiple factors, and there are four configuration paths to drive the improvement of rural economic resilience, namely, the element improvement type, the comprehensive optimization type, the technology boosting type and the intelligence driven type. Four configuration paths can give a reasonable explanation for spatio-temporal distribution characteristics of rural economic resilience.

Key words： rural economy resilience spatio-temporal distribution TOE framework evaluation index configuration effect

Received: 09 August 2023

PACS:

F329.9

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	TANG Xin
	XIE Shi-lei

Cite this article:

TANG Xin,XIE Shi-lei. Spatio-temporal Distribution and Configuration Influencing Factors of Rural Economic Resilience[J]. , 2023, 40(5): 78-87.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2023/V40/I5/78

[1] 陈梦远. 国际区域经济韧性研究进展——基于演化论的理论分析框架介绍[J].地理科学进展,2017,36(11):1435-1444.
[2] 李玉恒,黄惠倩,王晟业.基于乡村经济韧性的传统农区城乡融合发展路径研究——以河北省典型县域为例[J].经济地理,2021,41(8):28-33+44.
[3] 李晋,戴旭宏.脱贫摘帽后原深贫山区乡村的经济韧性构建——以四川省凉山州卢家营盘村为例[J].农村经济,2021,(11):45-52.
[4] 何珮珺,谭词.电子商务与乡村经济韧性——基于“电子商务进农村综合示范”政策的经验证据[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2023,(1):97-108.
[5] 邱明丽,刘殿锋,刘耀林.乡村韧性理论框架与测度体系[J].中国土地科学,2021,35(8):107-114.
[6] 齐昕,张景帅,徐维祥.浙江省县域经济韧性发展评价研究[J].浙江社会科学,2019,(5):40-46+156.
[7] 曾冰. 中国省域经济韧性发展水平评价[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2023,44(2):28-36.
[8] 李玉恒,黄惠倩,宋传垚.中国西南贫困地区乡村韧性研究——以重庆市为例[J].人文地理, 2022,37(5):97-105.
[9] 雷晓康,汪静.乡村振兴背景下农村贫困地区韧性治理的实现路径与推进策略[J].济南大学学报(社会科学版),2020,30(1): 92-99+159.
[10] 龙花楼,张英男,屠爽爽.论土地整治与乡村振兴[J].地理学报,2018,73(10):1837-1849.
[11] 韩楠,刘玉红,刘艳娟.我国乡村发展驱动因素与区域差异分析[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(4):40-48.
[12] 芦风英,邓光耀.中国省域乡村振兴水平的动态比较和区域差异研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2022,43(10):199-208.
[13] 毛锦凰,王林涛.乡村振兴评价指标体系的构建——基于省域层面的实证[J].统计与决策,2020,36(19):181-184.
[14] 贾晋,李雪峰,申云.乡村振兴战略的指标体系构建与实证分析[J].财经科学,2018,(11):70-82.
[15] 陈秧分,黄修杰,王丽娟.多功能理论视角下的中国乡村振兴与评估[J].中国农业资源与区划,2018,39(6): 201-209.
[16] 张挺,李闽榕,徐艳梅.乡村振兴评价指标体系构建与实证研究[J].管理世界,2018,34(8):99-105.
[17] Walker B, Holling C S, Carpenter S R et al. Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-ecological Systems[J].Ecology and Society,2004,9(2):5.
[18] Anselin L, Bera A K, Florax R et al. Simple Diagnostic Tests for Spatial Dependence[J].Regional Science & Ur-ban Economics,1996,26(1):77-104.
[19] Tornatizky L G, Fleischer M.Processes of Technological Innovation[M].Lexington: Lexington Books,1990.25.
[20] Chau K,Tam Y.Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems:An Exploratory Study[J].MIS Quarterly,1997,21(1):1-24.
[21] 张青,茹少峰.新型数字基础设施促进现代服务业虚拟集聚的路径研究[J].经济问题探索,2021,(7):123-135.
[22] Oliveir T,Martins M F.Literature Review of Information Technology Adoption Models at Firm Level[J].Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation,2011,14(2):312-323.
[23] Berg-Schlosser D, De Meur G, Rihoux B et al. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as An Approach[A].Berg-Schlosser D, De Meur G, Rihoux B(eds). Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques[M].Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications,2009.1-18.
[24] Sutaria V, Hicks D A.New Firm Formation:Dynamics and Determinants[J].Annals of Regional Science,2004,38(2):241-262.
[25] 谭海波,范梓腾,杜运周.技术管理能力、注意力分配与地方政府网站建设——一项基于TOE框架的组态分析[J].管理世界,2019,35(9):81-94.
[26] 廖彩荣,陈美球.乡村振兴战略的理论逻辑、科学内涵与实现路径[J].农林经济管理学报,2017,16(6):795-802.
[27] 杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017,(6):155-166.
[28] Fiss P C.Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research[J].Ac-ademy of Management Journal,2011,54(2):393-420.
[29] Ragin C C.Redesigning Social Inquiry[M].Chicago:Un-iversity of Chicago Press,2009.212.
[30] Schneider C Q,Wagemann C.Set- theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis[M].New York:Cambridge University Press,2012. 109.