政府购买公共服务关系契约风险的生成、识别及防范

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (1)

Download: PDF (595 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Relational contract is an important way of contract governance. The occurrence of relational contract of government purchasing public services follows the compensatory logic of dealing with subjects' bounded rationality, the instrumental logic of achieving non-verifiability goals and the beneficial logic of reducing transaction cost, However, latent risks are forming while it shows powerful application value. Through a systematic review, we found that in the process, including “establishment of demand, conclusion of contract, implementation of project, supervision for service and appraisal for performance” of government purchasing public services, “self-serving motivation” “interpenetration force” and “separation discourse” among purchasing subject, undertaking subject and consuming subject may induce “benefit screening” risk on relation preference, “rule shock” risk on informal institution, “task dislocation” risk in relation infiltration, “trust overdraft” risk in acquaintance circle and “deviation masking” risk in relation asylum. In order to promote “good governance” of the contract and healthy relationship of “government-society” during government purchasing public services, we need to find ways to prevent risks of the relational contract, so it is necessary to correct purchasing goal and take care of public discourse at the level of public service value, coordinate two-dimensional institution and reconcile plural interests at the level of partnerships value, construct trust network and portray ethical spirit at the level of relational contract value, improve the management technology and promote purchasing mechanism at the level of governance capacity value.

Key words： relational contract government purchase of public services risk generation risk identification risk prevention

Received: 28 January 2023

PACS:

D630

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	MAO Ming-ming

Cite this article:

MAO Ming-ming. Generation, Identification and Prevention of Relational Contract Risks in Government Purchase of Public Services[J]. , 2023, 40(4): 97-106.

URL:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/ OR https://xb.szu.edu.cn/EN/Y2023/V40/I4/97

[1] 丁煌. 西方行政学说史(第三版)[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2017.152.
[2] 刘世定. 嵌入性与关系合同[J].社会学研究,1999,(4):3-16.
[3] 汪云峰,刘仲英.基于关系合同的外包服务商成本问题分析[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2005,33(5):706-710.
[4] Bertelli A, Smith C.Relational Contracting and Network Management[J].Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,2010,20(Supplement 1):21-40.
[5] 孙元欣,于茂荐.关系契约理论研究述评[J].学术交流,2010,(8):117-123.
[6] 谈毅,慕继丰.论合同治理和关系治理的互补性与有效性[J].公共管理学报,2008,5(3):56-62.
[7] 高旭,李虹韦.关系合同的扩展、类型及交易效率研究——基于威廉姆森的关系合同理论[J].理论观察,2022,(3):32-37.
[8] 尹贻林,赵华,严玲,邓娇娇.公共项目合同治理与关系治理的理论整合研究[J].科技进步与对策,2011,28(13):1-4.
[9] Liu Y, Luo Y, Liu T.Governing Buyer-supplier Relationships through Transactional and Relational Mechanisms: Evidence from China[J].Journal of Operations Management,2009,27(4):294-309.
[10] 齐海丽. 公共服务购买中政社关系的依赖性及治理研究[J].经济体制改革,2016,(1):195-199.
[11] (美)B·盖伊·彼得斯.政府未来的治理模式[M].吴爱明,夏宏图译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2013.47.
[12] 叶托. 资源依赖、关系合同与组织能力——政府购买公共服务中的社会组织发展研究[J].行政论坛,2019,(6):61-69.
[13] 孙元欣,于茂荐.关系契约理论研究述评[J].学术交流,2010,(8):117-123.
[14] 吕芳. 我国政府购买服务的特殊制度逻辑——基于中西方公共服务合同外包实践的比较[J].中国行政管理,2019,(9):35-40.
[15] Melvin A.Eisenberg. Why There Is No Law of Relational Contracts[J].Northwestern University Law Review,2000,94(3):805-821.
[16] 张康之,李传军.行政伦理学教程(第三版)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2015.193.
[17] 刘承韪. 论关系契约理论的困境[J].私法,2011,18(2):39-59.
[18] (美)菲利普·库珀.合同制治理——公共管理者面临的挑战与机遇[M].竺乾威,卢毅,陈卓霞译.上海:复旦大学出版社,2007.5.
[19] (美)E.S.萨瓦斯.民营化与PPP模式:推动政府和社会资本合作[M].周志忍等译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2015.313.