|
|
|
| Ideological Symptoms and Governance of Tanking Culture |
| LIN Feng |
| School of Marxism, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, 401120 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract “Tanking” is a behavior where the parties involved abandon themselves, let themselves go, and let the situation develop. As a way of life, “tanking culture” is a fashionable pragmatism, refined egoism attitude and coping style with the value orientation of “avoiding shameful but useful”. It is a collection of complex social mentality that young people face when they face the gap between ideal and reality, effort and gain, success and failure. Among them are the jokes and self-mockery of “Diaosi”, the deconstructive irony of “Spoof”, the negative decadence of “Geyou Lie”, the desireless and desireless of “Buddhism”, as well as the inferiority and frustration of “Feichai” and the cynic escapes of “Lying Flat”. It can be seen that the “tanking culture” reflects a strong sense of powerlessness and a general sense of loss of control that youth groups have when they face difficulties and encounter setbacks. The culture of tanking has a distinct ideological color, presenting an ideological significance of resisting the tyranny of time in a fast-paced society, the failure of efforts to alleviate the spread of internal competition, and the construction of reverse identification in the dilemma of temporary escape. And under the combined force of the “I'm tanking and I'm happy” created by online carnival, the new form of digital labor derived from technological iteration, and the evaluation methods of quantifying social achievements and data calculation, the “tanking culture” has to some extent demonstrated the spiritual alienation of “self-doubt” and “self-negation”, the ideological crux of the labor alienation of “inferior games” and “digital gameplay”, as well as the self-alienation of “self-exploitation” and “self-exploitation”. In this regard, the mainstream ideology should introduce relevant policies and systems based on the diverse needs of youth to ensure the growth and development of youth, guide youth values with a new attitude of dialogue and inclusiveness, and take the construction of rule of law as the foothold to govern the cultural ecology of cyberspace.
|
|
Received: 20 March 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 郑作彧. 社会的时间:形成、变迁与问题[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2018.38.
[2] 廉思. 时间的暴政——移动互联时代青年劳动审视[J].中国青年研究,2021,(7):29-37.
[3] 马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2012. 139.
[4] 林龙飞,高延雷.“躺平青年”:一个结构性困境的解释[J].中国青年研究,2021,(10):78-84.
[5] 付宇,桂勇.当丰裕一代遭遇资产社会——解读当代青年的社会心态[J].文化纵横,2022,(2):18-28.
[6] 王鹭,陈志勇,社会媒体“摆烂”亚文化的价值流变、行为逻辑与调适政策[J].中国青年研究,2022,(11):13-21.
[7] 范宝舟,董志芯.符号拜物教的表现形式及精神异化特质探析[J].世界哲学,2019,(1).5-13.
[8] 陈希. C.福克斯从数字劳动异化视角对批判理论的反思与重构[J].学习与探索,2021,(11):18-25.
[9] (德)韩炳哲.倦怠社会[M].王一力译.北京:中信出版集团,2019.
[10] 马克思恩格斯文集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,2009. 286.
[11] 张晓凌. 中国佛教艺术审美特质的形成及转换[J].安徽师大学报(哲学社会科学版),1988,(1):80-86.
[12] 刘昕亭. 积极废人的痛快享乐与亚文化的抵抗式和解[J].探索与争鸣,2020,(2):107-112.
[13] 习近平. 在庆祝中国共产主义青年团成立100周年大会上的讲话[M].北京:人民出版社,2022.7-8. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 40 
