|
|
|
| Research on the Communication Characteristics, Logic and Paradigm of ChatGPT |
| WANG Jian-lei1,2, CAO Hui-meng2 |
1. School of Communication,Shenzhen University, Shenzhen,Guangdong, 518060;
2. Sino-foreign Cultural Exchange Center of the Ministry of Education,Omnimedia Industry-Education Integration Base (Shenzhen University), Shenzhen,Guangdong, 518060 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Under the investigation of the technical path, ChatGPT has the ability to generate dialogue through the unprecedented training of large language model and the learning of human feedback mode. The strengthening of its ability in word restructuring, self-expression correction and information integration has made it a new engine of knowledge production, and it can give certain emotional response through mastering special marks and empirical learning, the above elements forming a “super simulation” of human beings; At the same time, when people ask for answers, they form a group behavior of feeding AI spontaneously, therefore ChatGPT extends human beings in the reverse direction. With better connectivity and the opportunity to embed into the social operating system, ChatGPT brings new Moore Effect. It can be said the reverse technology dependence, dynamic connectivity and embedding, accelerating stacking hardware and upgrading algorithms become ChatGPT’s propagation logic. Finally, ChatGPT has opened a new subject era of “human-computer coexistence”. Human-computer collaboration will be a long-term social solution. However, the complexity of human-computer interaction and the derivative problems of AIGC may also fall into the confusion of multiple interpretations of interpretation experience. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct value reconstruction on the basis of breaking through the two traditional research paradigms of “subject-object dualism” and “interpretation empiricism”.
|
|
Received: 28 February 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 郝徐姜. 生命即对话——论巴赫金对话理论中的生命维度[J].中国比较文学,2022,(4):56-72.
[2] 刘若欠. 倾听与对话——中国古代两种口头信息传播形式[J].科学·经济·社会,1998,(3):65-67.
[3] Lund B D, Wang T. Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?[ED/OL].https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/LHTN-01-2023-0009/full/html,2023-02-14.
[4] 令小雄,王鼎民,袁健.ChatGPT爆火后关于科技伦理及学术伦理的冷思考[J].新疆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,(2).
[5] 彭茜,黄堃.ChatGPT,变革与风险[N].新华每日电讯,2023-02-14(007).
[6] (美)尼古拉斯·卡尔.浅薄:互联网如何毒化了我们的大脑[M].刘纯毅译.北京:中信出版社,2010.142.
[7] 张悦. 与编辑对话:从《纽约时报》的新闻聊天机器人看数字新闻业的演进——基于补偿性媒介理论视角[J].科技传播,2022,14(14):111-113.
[8] 陈昌凤.价值引领,让AI新闻业有能更有智[J].新闻与写作,2017,(11):1.
[9] (加)马歇尔·麦克卢汉.理解媒介:论人的延伸[M].何道宽译.南京:译林出版社,2011.
[10] (加)马歇尔·麦克卢汉.麦克卢汉如是说:理解我[M].何道宽译.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.192.
[11] 要欣委,李明伟.理解泛媒介:基于三个层度媒介观的比较研究[J].未来传播,2022,29(6):57-65.
[12] 邢怀滨. 社会建构论的技术观[M].沈阳:东北大学出版社,2005.44.
[13] (法)雷吉斯·德布雷.媒介学引论[M].刘文玲译.北京:中国传媒大学出版社,2013.122.
[14] Livingstone S.On the mediation of everything:ICA presi-dential address 2008[J].Blackwell Publishing Inc,2009,(1):56-75.
[15] 郭恩强. 在“中介化”与“媒介化”之间:社会思想史视阈下的交往方式变革[J].现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2018,(8):67-72.
[16] 孙玮,李梦颖.“码之城”:人与技术机器系统的共创生[J].探索与争鸣,2021,(8):121-129+179+2.
[17] (德)马丁·海德格尔.演讲与论文集[M].孙周兴译.北京:商务印刷馆,2018.13.
[18] (德)哈特穆特·罗萨.新异化的诞生:社会加速批判理论大纲[M].郑作彧译.上海:上海人民出版社,2018.9.
[19] 李明伟,林文刚.媒介矢量与传播学理论研究的媒介转向——兼评“媒介环境学译丛”[J].国际新闻界,2022,44(12):156-169.
[20] 李日容,张进.拉图尔的科学实践建构论对物的非现代性追问[J].兰州学刊,2018,(6):55-64.
[21] Lewis S C.Journalism in an Era of Big Data: Cases, Concepts, and Critiques[J].Digital Journalism,2014,(11):321-330.
[22] 喻国明,杨雅.5G时代:未来传播中“人—机”关系的模式重构[J].社会科学文摘,2020,(2):112-114.
[23] 全燕. 基于“奇点假说”的人机传播范式建构[J].南京社会科学,2021,(12):109-117.
[24] (澳)托比·沃尔什.2062:终结[M].罗静译.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2020.180.
[25] Carey, James W.Harold Adams Innis and Marshall Mcluhan[J].Antioch Review,1967,27(2):5-37.
[26] 张家俊.关于ChatGPT八个技术问题的猜想[ED/OL]. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/43kKLcFkJkTA5XbiCYxglw,2023-02-17.
[27] (美)约翰·杜海姆·彼得斯.奇云:媒介即存有[M].邓建国译.上海:复旦大学出版社,2020.3.
[28] (美)塞缪尔·P·亨廷顿.变化社会中的政治秩序[M].王冠华等译.上海:上海人民出版社,2008.31. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 40 
