|
|
|
| The Emotion, Reason and Law Implication of Chinese Rule of Law: The Origin of Etiquette and Law, Connotational Structure and Modern Function |
| XIANG Da |
| Law and Public Management School, Jishou University, Jishou, Hunan, 416000 |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Chinese rule of law is the embodiment of Chinese rule of law subjectivity, which comes from the practice of the socialist rule of law with Chinese characteristics and is an era expression of the traditional excellent legal culture in the legal system with Chinese characteristics. Chinese legal culture is realizing the transformation from legal orientalism to oriental legalism, showing the self-confidence of the legal culture of the times and the consciousness of legal theory. The Chinese-style rule of law interprets its personality traits through the connotation of emotion, reason and law, and shapes its distinctive “Chinese” characteristics. This connotation of emotion, reason and law is rooted in Chinese rural society and originated from traditional Chinese etiquette and law culture. Through the collaborative governance model of heavenly principles, national laws and human feelings, as well as the structural layout and functions of “upholding heaven and earth”, the value of Chinese-style rule of law has been achieved. The relationship between the “law of heaven” and the “law of rites”, the relationship between the “law of rites” and the “law of emotions” constitutes the connotation structure of the Chinese rule of law. In the context of the modernization of the Chinese rule of law, it is necessary to achieve the creative transformation and innovative development of the traditional Chinese rule of law through the relationship reconstruction and value reshaping of the law of reason and emotion, and to achieve its modern function through alternative dispute resolution, governance of the source of litigation and collaborative governance and other practical mechanisms.
|
|
Received: 01 November 2022
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] 鲁楠. 迈向东方法律主义?——评络德睦《法律东方主义》[J].交大法学,2017,(3):24.
[2] (美)萨义德.东方学[M].王宇根译.北京:三联书店,2007.4.
[3] (美)络德睦.法律东方主义:中国、美国与现代法[M].魏磊杰译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2016.
[4] 张芝梅.送法下乡:一个读本[J].中国社会科学,2002,(3):105.
[5] 苏力. 送法下乡——中国基层司法制度研究[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000.
[6] 费孝通. 乡土中国[M].北京:人民出版社,2015.1.
[7] 瞿同祖. 瞿同祖法学论著集[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1998.369.
[8] 胡健,董春诗.宗法社会的制度结构与制度演进——中国社会制度传承解析[J].制度经济学研究,2005,(1):135.
[9] 武树臣等. 中国传统法律文化[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1994.98.
[10] 王力行,高修俊,张奋成编.二十五史[M].乌鲁木齐:新疆青少年出版社,1999.177.
[11] (南宋)朱熹. 四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,2011.55.
[12] 向达. 《黄帝四经》“隆礼重法”的治道意义探析[J].吉首大学学报,2017,(4):82.
[13] 向达. 多元协同视域下的五治结合:渊源、意涵及实现路径[J].民间法,2022,(1):377.
[14] 尚书[M]尚书[M].周秉钧今译.长沙:湖南出版社,1997.30.
[15] 四书五经[M].陈戍国点校.长沙:岳麓书社,1991.
[16] (东汉)班固. 汉书[M].长沙:团结出版社,2002.124.
[17] 范忠信等. 情理法与中国人[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2011.
[18] (战国)荀况. 荀子[M].牟瑞平译注.济南:山东友谊出版社,2001.
[19] 蔡富强,罗婷玉.《白鹿原》中的礼法、乡约与治理转型[J].民间法,2017,(1):404.
[20] 范愉. 非诉讼纠纷解决机制研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2000.48.
[21] (法)勒内·达维德.当代主要法律体系[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1984.483.
[22] 黄宗智. 过去和现在:中国民事法律实践的探索[M].北京:法律出版社,2009.
[23] (日)滋贺秀三.明清时期的民事审判与民间契约[M].王亚新,范愉,陈少峰译.北京:法律出版社,1998.21.
[24] 吕廷君. 民间司法的“情、礼、法”[J].民间法,2013,(1):141.
[25] 俞可平. 治理与善治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000.270.
[26] 四川省成都市中级人民法院.新时代“枫桥经验”的成都实践:诉源治理[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2019.
[27] (美)博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,1999.199.
[28] 黄宗智. 中国研究的范式问题讨论[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2003.116.
[29] (德)马克斯·韦伯.法律社会学[M].康乐,简惠美译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2005.28.
[30] (德)马克斯·韦伯.中国的宗教宗教与世界[M].康乐,简惠美译.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004.162.
[31] (法)孟德斯鸠.论法的精神[M].张雁深译.北京:商务印书馆,1993.6.
[32] 苏力. 法治及其本土资源[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1996.13. |
|
|
|
2023, Vol. 40 
