Abstract：“Eurocentric” claims not only demonstrate earlier European comparatists’ self-awareness of comparative literature as a research field across languages, cultures and disciplines, but also nurture a biased critical discourse of world literature, as formulated by Franco Moretti and Pascale Casanova. The core idea of “ethnocentrism” in various forms is to see its own culture as unique and superior to other cultures. This misconception has impaired meaningful emotional connections, ethical resonance and the “consummate beauty of human nature” envisioned by Rabindranath Tagore. Parallel to this fallacy is the practice of ignoring or distorting shared humanity in much of contemporary Western scholarship, as manifest in the idea of Thomas Kuhn’s incommensurability, Jacquess Derrida’s différance, Michel Foucault’s China as heterotopia, the widely-discussed notion of untranslatability and the stereotyping of West, East or Asia. However, despite the professed differences, similarities and affinities shared by Mencius, Peter Singer and George Lakoff are surprisingly discernible in their discussions on moral principles, humanity and ways of philosophizing, which opens up the infinite possibility of sympathy and understanding. Thirty years ago, Claudio Guillen and René?Etiemble urged us to break with Euro-centrism and to fulfill the cosmopolitan ideal of East-West comparative studies. Nowadays, in view of political tension, escalated military conflicts and the lack of understanding, it is of utter necessity to promote cross-cultural understanding across East-West cultural-linguistic differences. It is not only the future of East-West comparative studies but also the promise of a better world.
[1] Pascale Casanova. The World Republic of Letters [M]. Trans. M. B. DeBevoise. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2004. [2] Rabindranath Tagore. World Literature (1907) [A]. Trans. Swapan Chakravorty. Ed. David Damrosch. World Literature in Theory [C]. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, 2014. [3] Kwame Anthony Appiah. Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers [M]. New York: W. W. Norton, 2006. [4] Peter Singer. Famine, Affluence, and Morality [J]. Philosophy and Public Affairs 3(1), 1972.231. [5] George Lakoff and Mark Johnson. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought [M]. New York: Basic Books, 1999.3. [6] Lionel Charles Dunsterville. “Stalky” on “Kipling’s India”(1933)[A].Ed.Roger Lancelyn Green.Rudyard Kipling: The Critical Heritage [C].London:Routledge,1997. [7] Francois Jullien with Thierry Marchaisse. Penser d’un Dehors (la Chine): Entretiens d’Extrême-Occident [M]. Paris: éditions du Seuil, 2000.39. [8] Richard Nisbett. The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently and Why[M].New York: The Free Press, 2003. [9] Charles Segal. The Greatness of Oedipus the King [A]. Ed. Harold Bloom. Sophocles’ Oedipus Plays: Oedipus the King, Oedipus at Colonus, & Antigone [C]. Broomall, Penn.: Chelsea House Publishers,1999. [10] Sophocles. The Theban Plays: Oedipus the King, Oedipus at Colonus, Antigone [M]. Trans. Ruth Fainlight and Robert J. Littman. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009.63. [11] William Shakespeare. King Lear [M].Ed. Burton Ruffel. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007.131. [12] Emily Apter. Against World Literature: On the Politics of Untranslatability [M]. London: Verso, 2013. [13] Zhang Longxi. The Tao and the Logos: Literary Herme-neutics, East and West[M].Durham: Duke University Press,1992.47. [14] Martin Buber. Ecstatic Confessions[M].Trans. Esther Cameron. New York: Harper & Row, 1985.7, 9. [15] T. S. Eliot. The Complete Poems and Plays, 1909-1950 [M].New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovish,1980.128. [16] Rainer Maria Rilke. Für Frau Fanette Clavel[A].Ed. Ernst Zinn. S?mtliche Werke, 12 vols [C]. Frankfurt am Main: Rilke Archive, 1976, vol.2,58. [17] Claudio Guillén. The Callenge of Comparative Literature [M]. Trans. Cola Franzen. Cambridge.Mass.: Harvard University Press,1993. [18] René Etiemble. Faut-il réviser la notion de Weltliteratur?[A].Essai de littérature (vraiment) générale[C].Paris:Gallimard, 1975.19,34. [19] Harish Trivedi. The Nation and the World: An Introduction [A].Eds. Harish Trivedi, Meenakshi Mukherjee, C. Vijayasree, and T. Vijay Kumar. The Nation across the World: Postcolonial Literary Representations [C].New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2008.xiii. [20] Amatya Sen. Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny [M]. New York: W. W. Norton, 2006.
2018, Vol. 35 
粤公网安备44030502007936号