Abstract：For the relationship between formal system and informal system in grassroots social governance, there are three representative views of “complementary theory”, “substitution theory”and“conflict theory”in the current discussion. But these are mostly based on static perspective analysis and ignoring the micro-governance “field”problem. And it is difficult to explain the phenomenon of institutional change. This article discusses the process of changing the C property management system. It is a process from the formal system failure to the informal system, and then to the informal system of “negative external” led to the formal system return, and shows a formal system and informal system “cyclical change” course. It can be seen that the relationship between the formal system and the informal system is not a static structure, but a dynamic process in which the institutional arrangements are constantly changing with the changing social scene. And the mechanism that makes this change lies in the “appropriateness” of institutional arrangements for governance. Based on this, the article explores the “appropriateness logic” of the system selection from the perspective of the relationship between the actors in the governance field, and deconstructs it into three characteristics, Which is the organic unity of the logic of the main body of governance, the rational application of the structure of the community residents, the organizational identity of the community resident. In this paper, we can provide some reference and reference for practical application.
刘振, 徐立娟. 基层社会治理实践中制度选择的“恰适性”逻辑[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2017, 34(5): 111-117.
LIU Zhen, XU Li-juan. The “Appropriateness” Logic of the Institutional Choice in the Practice of Grassroots Social Governance. , 2017, 34(5): 111-117.
2017, Vol. 34 
粤公网安备44030502007936号