特大城市新质生产力群体的主观幸福感与社区治理

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (5)

全文: PDF (523 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要新质生产力群体是推动生产力向更高级、更先进质态演进的力量。基于 2019 年中国 10 个特大城市的入户调查数据,运用分层线性回归模型和倾向值匹配模型,探讨社区治理状况、个体社会交往对新质生产力群体主观幸福感的影响,研究发现：新质生产力群体趋于迈向后物质主义幸福观,其主观幸福感显著高于非新质生产力群体,并更多地受到个体人际交往状况的积极影响。在社区治理方面,社区层面的社会信任对新质生产力群体的主观幸福感不但具有直接的提升作用,还会强化个体的边缘社交对该群体主观幸福感的消极影响程度;社区层面的社会参与对该群体的主观幸福感没有直接的影响,但却会强化个体的边缘社交和精英社交对主观幸福感的影响程度。对非新质生产力群体而言,社区层面的社会参与对该群体的主观幸福感甚至会产生直接的负面影响。在城市培育和吸引新质生产力群体的过程中,需通过构建互信、包容的社区软环境来推动不同社会群体之间的交流,营造良好的创新氛围。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	作者相关文章
	马丹
	袁浩

关键词 ：新质生产力群体, 主观幸福感, 特大城市, 社区治理, 社会交往

Abstract：The new quality productivity group is an important labor force that promotes the evolution of productivity to a higher and more advanced quality. Based on household survey data from ten megacities in China in 2019, using multi-level linear regression models and propensity score matching models, this paper explores the impact of community governance and individual social networking on the subjective well-being of the new quality productivity group. The results show that the new quality productivity group tends to move towards a post-materialistic view of happiness, with significantly higher subjective well-being than the non-new quality productivity group, and is more positively influenced by individual social networking. In terms of community governance, community social trust not only directly enhances the subjective well-being of the new quality productivity group, but also strengthens the negative impact of individual marginal communication on the subjective well-being of the group. Community social participation does not have a direct effect on the subjective well-being of the new quality productivity group. Still, it strengthens the influence of individuals’ marginal and elite communications on subjective well-being. For non-new quality productivity groups, community social participation can even have a direct negative effect on their subjective well-being. In the process of cultivating and attracting the new quality productivity groups in cities, it is necessary to improve communications between different social groups by building a social environment of mutual trust and tolerance, and to create a comfortable atmosphere for creativity.

Key words： new quality productivity group subjective well-being megacities community governance social networking

收稿日期: 2024-06-01

中图分类号:

C912

基金资助:国家社科基金重大项目“当代中国社会建设实践及其理论建构研究”（23&ZD172）

作者简介: 马丹,社会学博士,中共上海市委党校社会学教研部讲师,主要从事社会网络与城市社会学研究;袁浩,社会学博士,上海大学社会学院副教授,主要从事城市社会学与社会统计学研究。

引用本文:

马丹, 袁浩. 特大城市新质生产力群体的主观幸福感与社区治理[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2024, 41(4): 17-27. MA Dan, YUAN Hao. Subjective Well-Being of New Quality Productivity Group and Community Governance in Megacities. , 2024, 41(4): 17-27.

链接本文:

https://xb.szu.edu.cn/CN/ 或 https://xb.szu.edu.cn/CN/Y2024/V41/I4/17

[1] 习近平在中共中央政治局第十一次集体学习时强调加快发展新质生产力扎实推进高质量发展[N].人民日报,2024-02-02(001).
[2] 《求是》杂志评论员.深刻认识和加快发展新质生产力[J].求是,2024,(5):39-41.
[3] 任平.以新质生产力强劲推动高质量发展[N].人民日报,2024-04-09(001).
[4] 习近平经济思想研究中心.新质生产力的内涵特征和发展重点[N].人民日报,2024-03-01(009).
[5] 习近平. 发展新质生产力是推动高质量发展的内在要求和重要着力点[J].求是,2024,(11):4-8.
[6] 陈甬军.形成与新质生产力相适应的新型生产关系[N].光明日报,2024-03-19(011).
[7] 黄奇帆. 围绕新制造、新服务、新业态推动新质生产力发展[J].清华金融评论,2024,(2):47-50.
[8] Machlup F.Knowledge Industries and Knowledge Occu-pations[A].Psacharopoulos G (ed).Economics of Education[M].Oxford: Pergamon,1987.14-21.
[9] Drucker P F.The Rise of the Knowledge Society[J].The Wilson Quarterly,1993,17(2):52-72.
[10] (美)佛罗里达.创意阶层的崛起[M].司徒爱勤译.北京:中信出版社,2010.
[11] 盛来运. 风高浪急彰显韧劲踔厉奋发再创新绩——《2022年国民经济和社会发展统计公报》评读[J].中国统计,2023,(3):8-11.
[12] Pavot W, Diener E.Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale[J].Psychological Assessment,1993,5(2):164-172.
[13] Diener E, Oishi S, Lucas R E. Personality, Culture,Subjective Well-being: Emotional and Cognitive Evalu-ations of Life[J].Annual Review of Psychology,2003,54(1): 403-425.
[14] Brockmann H, Delhey J, Welzel C, et al.The China Puzzle: Falling Happiness in A Rising Economy[J].Journal of Happiness Studies:An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being,2009,10(4):387-405.
[15] Inglehart R, Baker W E. Modernization, Cultural Change,the Persistence of Traditional Values[J].American Sociological Review,2000,65(1):19-51.
[16] Delhey J.From Materialist to Post-Materialist Happ-iness? National Affluence and Determinants of Life Satisfaction in Cross-National Perspective[J].Social Indi-cators Research,2010,97(1):65-84.
[17] Amabile T M.A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations[J].Research in Organizational Behavior,1988, 10(1):123-167.
[18] Jensen K W, Liu Y, Sch tt T. Entrepreneurs Innovation Bringing Job Satisfaction,Work-Family Balance, and Life Satisfaction:In China and Around the World[J].Internatio-nal Journal of Innovation Studies,2017,1(4):193-206.
[19] Hackman J R, Oldham G R.Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of A Theory[J].Organizational Beha-vior and Human Performance,1976,16(2):250-279.
[20] 边燕杰,(美)Breiger R, (美)Davis D,等.中国城市的职业、阶层和关系网[J].开放时代,2005,(4):98-118.
[21] 张文宏.城市居民社会网络资本的阶层差异[J].社会学研究,2005,(4):64-81+244.
[22] Audretsch B.Agglomeration and the Location of Innov-ative Activity[J].Oxford Review of Economic Policy,1998, 14(2):18-29.
[23] 马鸿佳,侯美玲,宋春华.社会网络、知识分享意愿与个人创新行为:组织二元学习的调节效应研究[J].南方经济,2015,(6):100-113.
[24] Pinquart M, S rensen S. Influences of Socioeconomic Status, Social Network, and Competence on Subjective Well-Being in Later Life: A Meta-Analysis[J].Psychology and Aging,2000,15(2):187-224.
[25] (美)林南.社会资本: 关于社会结构与行动的理论[M].张磊译.上海:上海人民出版,2005.
[26] 郭小弦,芦强,王建.互联网使用与青年群体的幸福感——基于社会网络的中介效应分析[J].中国青年研究,2020,(6):5-12.
[27] 陆军,丁凡琳.多元主体的城市社区治理能力评价——方法、框架与指标体系[J].中共中央党校(国家行政学院)学报,2019,23(3):89-97.
[28] Putnam R.Social Capital: Measurement and Consequen-ces[J].Canadian Journal of Policy Research,2001,2(1):41-51.
[29] Helliwell J F, Putnam R D.The Social Context of Well-being[J].Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London,Series B: Biological Sciences,2004,359(1449):1435-1446.
[30] (美)帕特南.独自打保龄:美国社区的衰落与复兴[M].刘波等译.北京:北京大学出版社,2011.
[31] 彭定萍,丁峰,祁慧博.如何从个体化走向社会融合——社会参与对青年幸福感之研究[J].中国青年研究,2020,(1):49-55.
[32] Zhou J, Xie Y.Does Economic Development Affect Life Satisfaction? A Spatial-Temporal Contextual Analysis in China[J].Journal of Happiness Studies,2015,17(2):643-658.
[33] Hofstede G.The Cultural Relativity of the Quality of Life Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,1984,9(3):389-398.
[34] Amabile T M.The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1983,45(2):357-376.
[35] Zhou J, Hoever I J.Research on Workplace Creativity: A Review and Redirection[J].Annual Review of Organizati-onal Psychology and Organizational Behavior,2014,1(1):333-359.
[36] George J M, Zhou J.Dual Tuning in A Supportive Context: Joint Contributions of Positive Mood, Negative Mood, and Supervisory Behaviors to Employee Creativity[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(3):605-622.
[37] Jensen K W, Sch tt T. Firms’ Innovation Embedded in Their Networks of Collaboration: China Compared to the World[J].Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Stu-dies.2014,12(3):273-292.
[38] Pavot W, Diener E.The Affective and Cognitive Context of Self-Reported Measures of Subjective Well-Being[J]. Social Indicators Research,1993,28(1):1-20.
[39] 张勇. 论社会资本的社区公共空间向度[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2017,34(6):153-160.
[40] Portes A.Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology[J]. Annual Review of Sociology.1998,24(1):1-24.
[41] 周济南,罗依平.城市社区合作治理失灵的矫正:一个社会资本理论的分析框架[J].湖湘论坛,2021,34(4):118-128.