Abstract：Government information disclosure is of paramount importance in the digital era, as it serves to alleviate public uncertainty and foster a service-oriented government. Most of the existing studies encompass government information disclosure as a unified concept, with limited attention given to exploring the distinct impacts of different modes of government information disclosure (proactive disclosure and disclosure upon application) on the construction of service-oriented government. This paper employs the survey experiment method to empirically examine the influence mechanism of two government information disclosure modes on the construction of service-oriented government through four experiments. The findings demonstrate that: firstly, in comparison to disclosure upon application, proactive disclosure of government information is more conducive to enhancing citizens' perception of service-oriented government construction. Secondly, citizen trust mediates the impact of both modes of government information disclosure on the perception of service-oriented government construction. Thirdly, government digitization is the boundary condition for two kinds of government information disclosure to play a positive role. When citizens' perception of government digitization level is low, proactive disclosure of government information is more conducive to enhancing citizens' trust. When citizens' perception of government digitization level is high, the disclosure of government information upon application is more conducive to enhancing citizens' trust. Furthermore, in comparison to the government information disclosed upon application, perceived benefits have a stronger positive moderating effect on the association between proactive government information disclosure and citizen trust. Government managers should proactively enhance the extent and depth of information disclosure, effectively provide citizens with government information with higher value, and expedite the process of government digitalization.
李雪松, 王健. 政府信息公开促进服务型政府建设的作用机制与边界条件[J]. 《深圳大学学报》（人文社科版）, 2024, 41(2): 97-109.
LI Xue-song, WANG Jian. The Function Mechanism and Boundary Conditions of Government Information Disclosure to Promote the Construction of Service-oriented Government. , 2024, 41(2): 97-109.
[1] 王东方. 政府数据开放规范的精细化构建——基于政府数据开放与政府信息公开的关系视角[J].电子政务,2021,(10):29-40. [2] 张力. 政府信息公开收费:逻辑演进与制度完善[J].中国行政管理,2023,(2):29-38. [3] 马亮. 信息公开、行政问责与政府廉洁:来自中国城市的实证研究[J].经济社会体制比较,2014,(4):141-154. [4] 彭强,陈德敏.政府信息公开中公众参与规范化水平的优化与提升——基于信息权的探索[J].中国行政管理,2023,(1):52-59. [5] 于文超,王丹.政府信息公开、政策不确定性与企业盈余管理[J].产业经济研究,2022,(3):100-112+142. [6] 张明昂,鲁书伶,邵小快,等.政府信息公开、企业确定性预期与创新表现[J].财经研究,2023,49(4):94-108. [7] 王祎茗. 政府信息公开制度的治理效应分析——以政府信息公开工作年度报告为例[J].中共宁波市委党校学报,2022,44(3):97-107. [8] 张泰瑞,陈俊良,潘晴,等.基于“政府—公众”双主体的政府信息公开质量评估体系研究[J].情报理论与实践,2023,46(2):109-116. [9] Foroudi P, Akarsu T N, Ageeva E, et al.Promising the dream: Changing destination image of London through the effect of website place[J].Journal of Business Research,2018, 83:97-110. [10] 朱光磊,候绪杰.“双线合一”:论服务型政府的建设逻辑[J].南开学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,(3):10-21. [11] Assaker, G., Hallak, R.Moderating effects of tourists' novelty-seeking tendencies on destination image, visitor satisfaction, and short-and long-term revisit intentions[J].Journal of Travel Research,2013,52(5):600-613. [12] Choi G. J.,Tkachenko T.,Sil S.On the destination image of Korea by Russian tourists[J].Tourism Management,2011, 32(1):193-194. [13] 黄种滨,孟天广.突发公共危机中的政府信息公开与危机应对[J].电子政务,2022,(6):63-74. [14] 刘梦岳. 信任何以实现?——人际互动中的风险渐进与信息积累[J].社会学评论,2023,11(1):192-213. [15] 王建冬,窦悦,任军霞,等.从“整体性服务”到“智能体服务”:数字化转型背景下政府公共服务模式创新研究[J].电子政务,2023,(1):12-22. [16] Ma Y,Li B.Effect of digitalization on knowledge transfer from universities to enterprises: Evidence from postdoc-toral workstation of Chinese enterprises[J].Technology in Society,2022,71:102102. [17] 王琳,杨莹,姚飞飞.基于公众感知的政府数据开放平台信息服务质量评价实证研究:以沪深筑三地政府数据开放平台为例[J].图书馆学研究,2023,(8):48-58. [18] Lindgren I, Madsen CØ, Hofmann S, et al.Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services[J].Government Informa-tion Quarterly,2019,36(3):427-436. [19] Alamsyah N, Zhu Y Q.We shall endure: Exploring the impact of government information quality and partisan-ship on citizens' well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic[J].Government Information Quarterly,2022,39(1):101646. [20] 刘密霞,王益民,丁艺.政府信息公开推动电子政务环境下的公众参与[J].电子政务,2015,(6):76-82. [21] Rukanova B, van Engelenburg S, Ubacht J, et al. Public value creation through voluntary business to government information sharing enabled by digital infrastructure innovations: A framework for analysis[J].Government In-formation Quarterly,2023,40(2):101786. [22] Priporas C V, Stylos N, Kamenidou I E.City image, city brand personality and generation Z residents' life satis-faction under economic crisis:Predictors of city-related social media engagement[J].Journal of Business Resear-ch, 2020,119:453-463. [23] 廖梓豪,王丹彤,邹昀瑾.大数据治理、媒体选择与政府信息公开评价——基于突发公共危机调查的实证分析[J].安徽行政学院学报,2021,(5):41-51. [24] 朱军,宋成校.中国城市财政与经济透明度的全方位评估——来自333个地级市政府信息主动与依申请公开的实证分析[J].财政监督,2019,(9):10-18. [25] Wu Y, Xiao H, Yang F.Government information disclosure and citizen coproduction during COVID-19 in China[J].Governance,2022,35(4):1005-1027. [26] 龚会莲,李雯钰.公共服务获得感、社会公平感知对政府信任的影响研究——基于CGSS的实证分析[J].行政科学论坛,2023,10(8):58-64. [27] 钟兴菊,苏沛涛.信任转化与共生:社区治理共同体秩序构建的逻辑——基于城市锁匠的信任网络变迁分析[J].重庆社会科学,2022,(12):66-84. [28] Kampen J K, Maddens B, Vermunt J.Trust and satisfaction:A case study of the micro-performance theory[A].Salminen(ed).Governing Networks: EGPA Yearbook[C].Amsterdam:IOS Press,2003,22:319-322. [29] 谢艳琳. 疫情防控中的政府信息公开问题研究[J].经济研究导刊,2022,(5):140-142. [30] 刘百灵,夏惠敏,李延晖.移动购物用户信息披露意愿影响因素的实证研究——基于公平理论和理性行为理论视角[J].情报理论与实践,2017,40(5):87-93. [31] 李光勤,李潇格.政府数字化与中国对外直接投资的区位选择[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报),2023, (1):72-87. [32] 郭明军,陈东,王建冬,等.数字化转型背景下数字政府的建设模式与实践探索——基于琼黔鲁粤等地的调研思考[J].电子政务,2023,(1):2-11. [33] Luo H, Meng X, Zhao Y, et al.Exploring the impact of sentiment on multi-dimensional information dissemination using COVID-19 data in China[J].Computers in Human Behavior, 2023,144:107733. [34] 王文彬,王倩.基层治理数字化整体性转型:生态、逻辑与策略[J].深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版),2022,39(5):103-111. [35] 贾亚娟,张新奇.环境认知、感知利益对消费者参与快递包装分类回收意愿与行为悖离的影响[J].资源科学,2022,44(10):2060-2073. [36] 吕巍,杨颖,张雁冰.AI个性化推荐下消费者感知个性化对其点击意愿的影响[J].管理科学,2020,33(5):44-57. [37] 池毛毛,王俊晶,王伟军.突发重大疫情下基层政府信任对公民信息不披露意愿的影响机制研究[J].情报学报,2021,40(6):666-678. [38] 陈国良,张书维,陈文娜.公共管理研究中的联合实验:文献回顾、基本原理及结果实现[J].公共管理与政策评论,2023,12(3):152-168. [39] 李晓倩,马亮.公共管理实验研究中的实验报告:现状与评价——以国际期刊论文为例[J].公共管理与政策评论,2021,10(1):55-65. [40] 代涛涛,陈志霞.行为公共管理研究中的实验方法:类型与应用[J].公共行政评论,2019,12(6):166-185+203. [41] 李文彬,陈晓绚.公共管理实验法运用与反思:以公民满意度为例[J].广西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,57(5):79-94.
2024, Vol. 41 
粤公网安备44030502007936号